Difference between revisions of "The Political Principles of Peer-to-Peer Advocacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
===== Resource sharing and commons co-governance over resource hoarding and self-interest ===== | ===== Resource sharing and commons co-governance over resource hoarding and self-interest ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sharing re-usable tools not only cuts costs in our increasingly unstable global economy, but it's also just plain fair. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Transparency/awareness over secrecy ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A commitment to transparency accepts that p2p oversight is here to stay. | ||
= Society = | = Society = | ||
Revision as of 16:28, 4 February 2011
Contents
Politics
Transparency/awareness over secrecy
A commitment to transparency accepts that p2p oversight is here to stay.
"Parties", not "Party"
From singular entities to plurality. Remember, you are a party of one.
The most important political entity in Peer-to-Peer Advocacy is the you, person. Your value is exponentially greater than any party or organization of any type, in Peer-to-peer systems.
Government by you and your peers, where and when needed, and not present when not needed
Economics
Resource sharing and commons co-governance over resource hoarding and self-interest
Sharing re-usable tools not only cuts costs in our increasingly unstable global economy, but it's also just plain fair.
Transparency/awareness over secrecy
A commitment to transparency accepts that p2p oversight is here to stay.
