Difference between revisions of "Argument Map"

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'An argument map is a visual representation of the structure of an argument in informal logic. It includes the components of an argument such as a main contention, premises, co-pr...')
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
An argument map is a visual representation of the structure of an argument in informal logic. It includes the components of an argument such as a main contention, premises, co-premises, objections, rebuttals and lemmas. Typically an argument map is a “box and arrow” diagram with boxes corresponding to propositions and arrows corresponding to relationships such as evidential support. Argument mapping is often designed to support deliberation over issues, ideas and arguments in Wicked problems.
 
An argument map is a visual representation of the structure of an argument in informal logic. It includes the components of an argument such as a main contention, premises, co-premises, objections, rebuttals and lemmas. Typically an argument map is a “box and arrow” diagram with boxes corresponding to propositions and arrows corresponding to relationships such as evidential support. Argument mapping is often designed to support deliberation over issues, ideas and arguments in Wicked problems.
  
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Condorcet_Method_argument_map.png A Rationale map] arguing in favour of [[Condorcet]] voting methods.
+
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Condorcet_Method_argument_map.png A Rationale map] arguing in favour of [[wikipedia: Condorcet voting methods| Condorcet voting methods]].
  
 
Argument Maps are often used in the teaching of reasoning and critical thinking, and can support the analysis of pros and cons when deliberating over [[wikipedia:wicked problem|wicked problem]]s.
 
Argument Maps are often used in the teaching of reasoning and critical thinking, and can support the analysis of pros and cons when deliberating over [[wikipedia:wicked problem|wicked problem]]s.
  
Argument maps have been applied in many areas, but foremost in educational, academic and business settings.[4] It has also been proposed that argument mapping has a great potential to evolve how we understand and execute democracy, in reference to the ongoing evolution of e-democracy.
+
Argument maps have been applied in many areas, but foremost in educational, academic and business settings. It has also been proposed that argument mapping has a great potential to evolve how we understand and execute democracy, in reference to the ongoing evolution of [[E-Democracy Webcasts Directory|e-democracy]].
 
<ref>[[wikipedia: Argument map]]</ref>
 
<ref>[[wikipedia: Argument map]]</ref>
  
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
 +
[[Category: Governance]]
 +
[[Category:Facilitation]]
 +
[[Category:Intelligence]]

Latest revision as of 03:30, 13 October 2010

An argument map is a visual representation of the structure of an argument in informal logic. It includes the components of an argument such as a main contention, premises, co-premises, objections, rebuttals and lemmas. Typically an argument map is a “box and arrow” diagram with boxes corresponding to propositions and arrows corresponding to relationships such as evidential support. Argument mapping is often designed to support deliberation over issues, ideas and arguments in Wicked problems.

A Rationale map arguing in favour of Condorcet voting methods.

Argument Maps are often used in the teaching of reasoning and critical thinking, and can support the analysis of pros and cons when deliberating over wicked problems.

Argument maps have been applied in many areas, but foremost in educational, academic and business settings. It has also been proposed that argument mapping has a great potential to evolve how we understand and execute democracy, in reference to the ongoing evolution of e-democracy. [1]

See Also

References